BBC Uncanny – the White Mountain UFO

Anyone interested in supernatural folklore is likely to have heard of the Danny Robins series “Uncanny” on Radio 4. Episodes are written and presented by Danny Robins, with guest various experts – notably Ciarán O’Keeffe for the septics and Evelyn Hollow for the believers. The latest venture is “Uncanny Cold Cases”, currently running, presenting older stories instead witness testimony.

This is worth a listen if you’re interested in what leads people to believe what they do, and an awful lot of people do think they’ve seen a ghost. But for some reason, Uncanny can’t keep away from UFO stories. With ghosts, people say they’ve seen something strange and you either believe them or don’t, but UFOs are more objective.

The latest episode is “The White Mountain UFO”, which is referring to the alleged abduction of Barney and Betty Hill in 1961. The couple were driving back from a holiday in Montreal to their home in Lancaster, New Hampshire, USA. Seeing a light in the sky they stopped to have a better look. Having seen a flying saucer and aliens they fell into a daze and woke up in their car, close to home, with no recollection of how they got there. The story has become embellished over time.

A mundane explanation is that they were over-tired, hallucinating and it’s lucky they didn’t fall asleep and drive into a tree. However, under hypnosis they both told a similar story about being abducted by aliens in the missing hours.

In an era of cold war paranoia, and in a country gripped in the 1960s flying saucer hysteria, the Hills were interviewed by the USAF and NICAP, the (American) National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena.

So far so meh. Where Uncanny suddenly became interesting was with some physical evidence. Apparently Mrs Hill’s dress had some unexplained pink stains that were investigated later and found to be contaminated in a way that was impossible by natural means. They found Rhodium and Tellurium on the dress, which are present at the earth’s surface at 0.0002 parts per million – but possibly more common in space. These are the “facts” presented.

But is this the smoking gun Uncanny is suggesting? Some physical indisputable evidence? I hadn’t heard of the dress being tested before before, so I did some digging. You’ll never guess what I found.

The tests were actually done by analytical chemist Phyllis Budinger, who had become interested in the case. She believes in UFOs. She contacted Kathleen Marden, Betty Hill’s niece, and obtained five fabric samples in 2001; the lining, three from the discoloured areas and a fourth from a clean patch as a control. Over the next couple of years she conducted tests – infrared spectra on the surface and of solvent extractions, and good old microscope analysis. She also got some X-ray fluorescence tests done by the University of Pittsburgh. The results appeared in a book, “Captured!”, written none other than Ms Marden and Stanton Friedman, where it’s stated that this new analysis found rare and unusual heavy metals. And this appears to be the source used in Uncanny.

However, this is a very selective interpretation. These heavy metals are indeed seriously rare. However the figure giving their prevalence is an average over the earth’s surface but this says nothing about concentrations. Being rare on average is not the same as being rare on early 1960s dresses.

Those doing the XRF were somewhat more circumspect. They noted it was unusual, and suggested the graduate chemistry department conduct more extensive scans to corroborate, describing their own tests as “cursory”. As far as I can tell, no such further testing was carried out.


Budinger herself suggests getting a biologist involved and looking at the DNA, but concluded the pink was a result of mould caused by whatever was contaminating the fabric in some areas.

The results can be found as Technical Service Response No UT025 from Frontier Analysis Ltd.

So that’s that for the physical evidence. What of the hypnosis? Both of the hills recounted a story with details very similar to episodes of a TV programme “The Outer Limits” that aired in the weeks before the hypnotic regressions. The Hills may have been accessing repressed memories of their abduction three years earlier, or they may have been remembering a TV programme they watched three weeks earlier. You decide.

The sessions were conducted by psychiatrist Dr. Benjamin Simon, who concluded that the abduction experience as recalled under hypnosis “did not take place but was a reproduction of Betty’s dream which occurred right after the sighting.” The story revealed under hypnosis is often presented as true, but this is a misrepresentation. Dr Simon’s letters to Philip J. Klass make his scepticism clear. Meanwhile other people, including the aforementioned Ms Marden, need it to be true to sell books. This may affect their credulity, again you decide.

Further corroborating evidence of the Hills account was presented in the episode – specifically radar returns (contacts) of an unknown object at the time of their disappearance. These may have been taken from various books on the subject – quite likely Jacques Vallée’s “Dimensions”, which describes a return signal monitored by Pease Air Force Base. This was on the approach radar, and the extract reads:

observed unidentified aircraft come on precision approach radar 4 miles out, aircraft made approach and pulled up at half a mile, shortly after observed weak target on downwind, then when it made low approach, tower unable to see any aircraft at any time.

This was at 2:14am local time, after the Hill’s sighting, possibly the UFO flying away after being undetected for the last four hours? Or perhaps it was an unidentified aircraft on an aborted approach, which isn’t exactly unusual.

Another return comes from the North Concord Air Force in Vermont, which tracked an object for 18 minutes – fitting the podcast. It was recorded by Project Blue Book. However, it’s not corroboration either:

…one object detected on height-finder radar at 62,000 feet, appearing at 196 degrees at 84 miles, lost at 199 degrees at 80 miles, moving north then south, observed for 18 minutes.

It was high in the air, moving slowly and erratically, exactly like a weather balloon – which was their actual assessment. It was also seen at 5:22pm Eastern time – long before the Hills’ sighting.

Mr Hill died before his time in 1969 aged 43, but his wife survived until 2004 and was well known in UFO circles, although not universally believed according to many accounts.

So where does this leave the BBC’s Uncanny podcast? The evidence that this story doesn’t amount to a white hill of beans is out there, so why didn’t Dr O’Keeffe blow it out of the water? I guess that’s entertainment!

Gary McKinnon who has Asperger’s syndrome

The Home Secretary (Alan Johnson) has just answered an emergency question in the commons as to why he’s declined to block the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the USA for ‘hacking’ (whatever that means). He said that the medical evidence didn’t amount to enough, he’d admitted he was guilty, and besides, he hasn’t got any discretionary powers in the matter.

In some ways, I agree with him. McKinnon may very well have done what he’s been accused of; and as far as Asperger’s Syndrome goes – do me a favour!

Gary McKinnon
Gary McKinnon
He was diagnosed with this condition last year by Prof. Simon Baron-Cohen from Cambridge University. It’s a psychological illness, right? Well actually there are many who’d doubt that. He certainly seems to be the authority on the subject, based on the number of papers published and TV appearances – acceptable to academia and pop culture. He’s the country’s foremost expert on the condition. But is it an illness?

A few years back Prof. Baron-Cohen devised the A.Q. test, a series of 50 self-assessment questions for those wondering if they have the condition. Apparently the general population scores 28%. I score 76%. Do I have a mental illness? I don’t think so; in fact it’s often said that half the scientists in the world would score highly on the assessment too. Us nerds might be different, but so are gay people. Try telling them they’re ill! If you want to know more, just Google the subject.

Gary McKinnon is also, apparently, upset and depressed. Who wouldn’t be in his circumstances?

It might be worth reminding ourselves what he’s actually done (according to Alan Johnson):

He accessed US government computers looking for UFO evidence while smoking dope (as one does), and in the processes has damaged their operation. According to the Americans (and Mr Johnson) he knocked out all the military computers in Washington for 24-hours.

Apparently this was done by using perl to look for blank passwords, a technique a find entirely credible. That’s right – McKinnon is a script kiddie. He claims he was caught when using Windows Remote Desktop while the real user was still on the machine, which also fits.

Now for this he deserves to be prosecuted, the same as the morons who were prosecuted for criminal damage while attempting to thieve hereabouts. The difference is that Harrow magistrates decided just to give them a good ticking off after they’d made up some sob story about turning their life around. McKinnon’s treatment is on the other extreme.

Unfortunately for him, there’s an obvious political element. The American military has lost (more) credibility and they want someone, preferably foreign, to divert attention. They can’t catch Bin Laden, so he’ll have to do. Anyone in the data security game knows that any serious cyber-criminals will be able to cover their tracks, so IF serious deliberate damage was done and IF they traced it back to this script kiddie then the one thing you can be pretty sure of is that he wasn’t behind it. Either that, or all the computers in Washington were in such a fragile state that they’d fall over if you sneezed.

In spite of the Home Secretary’s assurances about the extradition arrangements between here and the USA being reciprocal, many will suspect that this case results from the special Labour-Bush relationship – the one where Bush asked and Blair gave.

If Alan Johnson is right, and he really does have no discretion to stop this charade, the real question David Burrowes (McKinnon’s MP) should have followed his answer with was “Why not?”